Monday, 20 May 2019

NATIONAL INTEGRATED IDENTITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/ HUDUMA NAMBA; BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES IN KENYA


Abstract
Identification schemes are key enablers for the effective delivery of services and more broadly for the quality of engagement between a country’s government and its citizens. Legal identity is now recognized as an essential element of development; target 16.9 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) refers to the provision of universal legal identity, including through birth registration, by 2030. Legal identity is central to the rights set out, for example, in the Declaration of Human Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In addition, effective identification is important for at least ten of the other SDGs. This paper tends to investigate the role of NIIMS, its challenges and benefits for presentation.
Key words:  Huduma number, NIIMS, Huduma Namba
Introduction
The concept of information management and provision of access has experienced good progress in Kenya. However, some solvable problems by the same concept still persist.
Passports, driver’s licenses, and employee ID cards are all components of what might be referred to as identity management systems – i.e., they are credentials issued by an entity for the purpose of identifying individuals, and they are used by such individuals to validate their identity in order to enter into a transaction with a third party.
In Nigeria, National Identity Management Commission (NIMC), has rolled out National Identity Management System (NIMS) to integrate several government databases
including those for driving licenses, voter registration  health insurance, taxes and pensions (BBC News, 2014)
Under the ID4D program identification systems are assessed against three main criteria: the robustness of the credentials; how widely they are held across the population, and whether the ID system is, in fact, integrated into a wide range of uses. A fourth criterion is the strength of the legal framework for data protection and the privacy of personal data. Measured against the first three criteria, Kenya’s system has considerable strengths, including the creation of a functioning national ID system with wide coverage. Processes are ongoing to shift to a fully digital system and to expand the scope of e-Governance. Efforts are also in progress to facilitate change management and build the capacity of civil servants to cope with the rapidly evolving digital ID ecosystem. For each of the three ID4D assessment criteria the rating would be in the middle of the range
To offer government services online in order to improve on governance, the following systems will be developed as outlined in the vision 2030:
·         Pensions Management Information System (PMIS);
·         A Company Registry and e-voting; digitized court recording;
·         Geographic Information System (GIS);
·         digitization of archival resources at the Kenya National Archives;
·         Land Registry System;
·         Electronic Banking Systems,
·         District Management Information System (DMIS) and
·         Integrated Population Registration System (IPRS)
Legislative Framework
Identification and registration of citizens has been carried out in Kenya since 1904 though registration of Births and Deaths under the Births and Deaths Act cap 149 and the Registration of Persons Act cap 107 and other legislations on management of Citizens and Aliens In 2005, the Government of Kenya (GoK) initiated the registration of persons using a harmonized approach to address duplication, efficiency and reduced tax payers money. This exercise has been managed and coordinated by the Integrated Population Registration System (IPRS) To improve on the progress made by IPRS, the Government, through Executive Order No. 1 of (2018), and The Statute law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2018,Sec. 9A established the National Integrated Identity Management System (NIIMS) programme, code-named Huduma Namba.
Statement of the problem
Huduma Namba is a programme which was initiated through Executive Order No. 1 of 2018 to create and manage a Central Master Population Register which will be the authentic ‘source of truth’ of identity of all persons residing in Kenya. The aim of the Huduma namba is develop a national biometric population database of all persons in Kenya and to assign a personal unique identification to facilitate access to government services. However, there has been more complains raised by the public which can not be ignored. This has triggered this paper .
Purpose of the study
The purpose of this aimed at investigating the role of Huduma namba, benefits and the challenges

Methodology
This was a conceptual paper which reviewed literature and also highlighted the views and opinions of the researchers in line with challenges and opportunities of NIIMS

National Integrated Information Management System.
NIIMS is a national programme for registration of all Kenyan citizens and foreign nationals in the country NIIMS will establish central master population register, that will be the authentic ‘single source of truth’ on a person’s identity.
NIMS envision to be a single national custodian of persons' identification data in Kenya. It aim to conduct a National Biometric Registration of all Kenyan citizens and foreign nationals residing in the country for enhanced service delivery
Problems with the previous Identity management system.
Identification systems are assessed against three main criteria:
·         The robustness of the credentials;
·         How widely they are held across the population, and
·         Whether the ID system is, in fact,
integrated into a wide range of uses.
·         A fourth criterion is the strength of the legal framework for data protection and the privacy of personal data.
Measured against the first three criteria, Kenya’s system has considerable strengths, including the creation of a functioning national ID system with wide coverage. Processes are ongoing to shift to a fully digital system and to expand the scope of e-Governance. Efforts are also in progress to facilitate change management and build the capacity of civil servants to cope with the rapidly evolving digital ID ecosystem.
For each of the three assessment criteria the rating would be in the middle of the range. Nevertheless, areas for improvement have been identified. The system has a number of limitations:
A. Lack of a strong integrated focus. The components of the registration/identification system have traditionally functioned in silos, each with its specific mandate. Unlike countries such as Peru or Pakistan, Kenya does not have a single authority mandated to provide identification services across the population. This implies considerable duplication of registration facilities as well as disjointed data from the various agencies. There is also no unique “number for life” to identify individuals from cradle
to grave.
B. Limited registration coverage and application gaps. Estimated rates of birth and death registration, at 63% and 45% respectively, are too low to provide a solid foundation for the national registration system. Coverage of the ID card system is probably quite high (poor death registration makes it impossible to distinguish the number of active cards from the number issued) but it appears to be lower in the poorest and border areas, particularly in the North, that have the lowest rates of birth registration and the highest percentage of vulnerable people and are also of the greatest concern from a security perspective.
The use of the system to support e-Government applications on a decentralized basis, including through the Huduma centers, is constrained by still-limited connectivity. Not all users (administrators of various services) of ID services have full access to the consolidated population registration data that enables a check of the validity of an ID card.
C. Outdated technology: manual processes and paper records. The system has only recently begun to evolve from paper-based to digital processes and from paper records to digital databases with some important components still needing to be scanned and digitized. Some key databases lack emergency backup and/or off-site backup. The heavy reliance on manual processes, as well as weak birth and death registration and an ID number without check digits increases the potential for error and possible ID fraud.
A.    A focus on verifying documents rather than authenticating people. The biometric data collected in the process of registration, i.e. 10 fingerprints and photo, is not readily accessible to help authenticate individuals against their ID credentials. As a result  several programs have developed, or are developing, independent biometric systems for this purpose, raising the prospect of costly
incompatible systems. The problem of individual identification (as opposed to the validation of credentials) will become more urgent as the system shifts to remote applications.
E. An evolving legal framework. The increasing accumulation of personal data in electronic formats raises the importance of strengthening the legal framework around data privacy. Kenya does not yet have data protection legislation as the 2012 Data Protection Bill is still under consideration. Kenya will need to pass legislation covering data protection and the privacy of personal data, and to ensure that its identification system is fully compliant with its requirements.
F. The need to look ahead. All of these issues are relevant in the context of the current system of
registration and identification. They are also important as Kenya looks to the future, towards its “ThirdGeneration” ID system. Even as Kenya is able to impart valuable lessons to other countries, it may be
able to learn from the experience of selected countries that have introduced improved approaches
and in some cases new technology to create more advanced identification systems
Roles of NIIMS
ü  To create, manage, maintain and operate a national population register as a single source of personal information of all Kenya citizens and foreigners residing in the country.
ü  To assign a unique national identification number to every person registered.
ü  To harmonize, incorporate and collate into the register, information from other data bases in the government agencies relating to registration of persons.
ü   To support the printing and distribution for collection of all national identification cards, foreigner certificates, births and deaths certificates, driving licenses, work permits, passports and foreign travel documentation, student identification cards issued under the Births and Deaths Registration Act, Basic Education Act, Registration of Persons Act, Basic Education Act, Refugees Act, Traffic Act and the Kenya Citizenship and the Immigration Act and all other forms of government issued identification documentation as may be specified by the cabinet secretary.
ü  To prescribe, in consultation with the various relevant issuing authorities a format of identification document to capture the various forms of information contained in the identification documents for purposes of issuance of a single document where applicable.
ü  To verify and authenticate information relating to the registration and identification of persons To collate information obtained under this act and reproduce it as may be required from time to time
ü  To ensure the preservation protection and security of any information or data collected, obtained and maintained or stored in the register.
ü  To correct errors in registration details, if so required by a person or on its own initiative to ensure that the information is accurate, complete, up to date and not misleading and;
ü  To perform such other duties which are necessary for expedient for the discharge of functions under the act.
Benefits of NIIMS/Huduma Number
A National biometric population register of all Kenyan citizens and foreign nationals residing in Kenya will be established. This will be used for planning purposes.
ü  Enhanced existing national registration databases in Kenya
ü   Harmonized persons’ identity data across different domains
ü   Easy access to government services through the Huduma Namba
ü   A national reference frame for stakeholders to facilitate respective registrations such as farmer registration, registration for universal health care (NHIF) registration of driving licenses
ü   Coordinated registration of persons
ü  Address duplication in registration and reduce operational costs, detect and prevent fraud, impersonation or any other crime.
ü  An enabler of the big four (4) Agenda.
·         Agenda 1. 100% Food and Nutrition Security.
 NIIMS will facilitate biometric identification and registration of farmers NIIMS will inform access to subsidized farm inputs (seeds, fertilizers)
·         Agenda 2. Access to Universal Healthcare.
 NIIMS will enhance access to healthcare through NHIF registration NIIMS will identify fraudulent persons through inaccurate data
·         Agenda 3. Affordable Housing.
 NIIMS will inform planning and investment in affordable housing
·         Agenda 4. Manufacturing.
 NIIMS will identify sources of raw materials for manufacturing NIIMS will identify SMEs and skills gaps in employment
Suitability of NIIMS
§  NIIMS registration will continue after the mass registration exercise.
§  The Assistant Chiefs will remain with the registration gadgets and continue registering new born and any other persons who will have been left out in the mass registration exercise.
§  Those who will have attained 6 years will also have their biometrics captured.
§  Harmonization and integration of NIIMS with other systems.
§  Real time capture of births and deaths as they occur
Challenges
§  Fear from Kenyan that the Huduma namba is aimed at nailing those with criminal records, however, this might be true to some extent as it will be easy to track the criminals. Those released from jail were reluctant in registering due to poor record.
§  Rumors that it is will be used to get those who do not file their returns or submit tax. This has led to reluctant by citizens to accept the Huduma namba
§  Myths that Huduma namba is the satanic 666 in the Holy bible. This rumors hit the social media which came from some religious pastor. This is not the case .
§  Rumors that this is a new scheme by the government to drive rigging of elections. This has sparked resistance by the citizens.
§  Lack of awareness by citizen. Mobilization which was to be done from 1st Oct 2018 to 10th may 2019 was not well done. This is because the Huduma namba have come to the public a in April. This have resulted to lack of awareness about the program by the citizens. Civic education was not properly done
§  Slow registration process. The process of registration have been hampered by failure in biometric kit and to some stations taking up to 30 minutes to register a single person as opposed to 6 minutes expected. This slow the process and result to impatient among the citizens.
§  Incorrect data in the register. Some citizens could go to register but in the process they are informed their location, division or sub location is not in the register e.g Shamata location not in the register. The make them to register with the neighboring area. The is a clear indication of the inconsistency in register. This is a very serious issue that need attention during data clean-up as may result to poor planning hampering decision making. E.g some area may be allocated little resources especially when people in that area register in the neighboring areas increasing the population.
This should be fixed as it might lead to false information which may led to many legal suits as giving false information and declaring it to be correct is punishable under section 129 (a) of penal code.
§  Lack of proper familiarization with the registration kits by the clerks also affected the process. Proper orientation of process ought to have been done.
§  Some men who have 'mistresses' (mpango wa kando) feared to register so their property will not be brought to the open and be subdivided between his wife and mistresses.
§  Legal suit. The Kenya National Human Rights Commission and two others had filed a petition, where LSK was enjoined as an interested party, challenging the coming into effect of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2018 that introduced changes to the Registration of Persons Act that brought in the National Integrity Identity Management System (Niims), popularly known as the Huduma Namba. In the court ruling, judges Pauline Nyamweya, Mumbi Ngugi and Weldon Korir barred the government from making the registration mandatory, setting deadlines for the listing, denying public services to any unregistered Kenyan, and sharing any information collected with third parties.

Those who will not register for the Huduma namba will not be able to get the following services as highlighted by inter-ministerial committee on Huduma namba

·         Registration of birth certificates,
·         Land registration,
·         Replacement of lost exam certificates,
·         Civil marriages,
·         Getting initial identification cards and
·         Issuance of single business permits. 
·         Issuance of death certificates,
·         Application and renewal of driving license
·         Application and renewal of driving license
·         Claims for pensions,
·         Filing tax return,
·         Application for title deeds
·         NHIF,
·         NSSF ,
·          Cash transfer to the elderly,
·         Subsidized farm inputs among others.
·         Applying and renewal of government documents
Conclusion
The long awaited digital era is here and promising benefits to Kenyan citizen. This will lead to a new database of information for citizen. This record should be used in budgeting and planning to determine budget allocation to County government based on the number of residents in that county. This will be a milestone in achieving equality in resource allocation.


References
Nigeria Launches National Electronic ID  Cards”, BBC News (August 8, 2014)
Registration of Persons Act CAP 107 of the   Laws of Kenya: 1947 revised 2018

About the Author
Douglas Mwangi Maina is a Masters student in the school of Information Science and Technology, Kisii University, Kenya. He is an archivist and a Certified Records Management Analyst (CRMA) and also hold CPA(Sec 4). You can reach him on   0717834480. Email:mainamwangi1989@gmail.com


Tuesday, 28 August 2018

THE ROLE OF RECORD MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS IN FIGHT AGAINST CORUPTION IN PUBLIC SECTORS OF KENYA



 THE ROLE OF RECORD MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS IN FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC SECTORS OF KENYA

Douglas Mwangi Maina
0717834480
Masters Student -Kisii University
Prof. Ezra Okemwa
Registrar Academic & Student Affairs, Machakos University
Adjuct Lecturer - Kisii University
(SEMINAR PAPER)

Abstract
The key principles of corporate governance include transparency, accountability and risk management. Successful implementation of these principles in public organisations is dependent on the availability of information. In Kenya today many government organisations do not have qualified records professionals and the result is the existence of poor records management that are characterized as fraudulent and corrupt. This paper discusses the role of records management professionals in fighting corruption in Public Sectors of Kenya. The paper argues that qualified Records management professionals are crucial in the fight against corruption because a good records management programme ensures availability of information that can serve as evidence to identify abuse or misuse of resources and noncompliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, good records management practices promote efficiency in the operations of an organisation by eliminating bureaucracies and other loopholes that underpin corruption. Using examples from public sectors in Kenya, this paper attempts to demonstrate the extent to which records management professionals supports the fight against fraud and corruption. The paper also includes literature review that corroborates the examples cited. Recommendations are provided in the conclusion.

Key words:  Accountability; corruption; governance; records management; Transparency

Introduction
Transparency International defines corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for gain. The International Financial Institutions Anti-Corruption Task Force (2006) defines a corrupt practice as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting, directly or indirectly, anything of value to influence improperly the actions of another party . According to Keorapetse and Keokopa (2012) corruption therefore, involves illegal and inappropriate actions on the part of officials in public and private organisations, in which they
inappropriately enrich themselves and / or their associates, or entice others to do so, by misusing the position in which they occupy.

Corruption has various types or categories that include petty corruption that is practiced by poorly paid public servants; grand corruption which involves theft of vast amounts of public and private resources; arbitrary corruption where individuals randomly seek for bribes; systematic corruption where perpetrators are organised in cartels or in systematic ways as individuals or groups to demand, extort or commit corrupt practices; political corruption symbolized by an environment that is lawless; and business or corporate corruption through which impunity and moral decadence prevail.

The World Bank (2017) has observed that businesses and individuals pay an estimated $1.5 trillion in bribes each year, which is about 2% of global GDP and 10 times the value of overseas development. Hence, according to the International Monetary Fund (2016), addressing corruption has become increasingly urgent. This sense of urgency arises in an environment where growth and employment prospects in many countries remain subdued and a number of many high profile corruption cases have fueled moral outrage. The urgency is global in nature since corruption affects both developed and developing countries.

Problem Statement
The role of records management professionals in preventing and detecting corrupt practices in public sector of Kenya has been overlooked. Although legislation for the management of records exists, the requirements for recordkeeping have not been fully adopted in the country’s public institutions and this obstructs the fight against corruption.

Purpose of the study
This study sought to assess the role of Records Management Professional in fight against corruption in public sectors of the republic of Kenya.

Corruption in East Africa
The 2016 Corruption Perception Index by Transparency International ranked Somalia as the most corrupt country in the world. At position 176, Somalia is followed by South Sudan 175, Burundi 159, Uganda 151, Kenya 145, Tanzania 116 and Rwanda at 50. The report noted that corruption hurts all countries. In the index’s lower scoring countries, people frequently face situations of bribery and extortion, rely on basic services that have been undermined by the misappropriation of funds and confront official indifference when seeking redress from authorities that are corrupt. In higher scoring countries, the situation may seem less obvious in the daily lives of citizens, but closed door deals, illicit finance and patchy law enforcement exacerbate many forms of corruption.

Corruption is a cause for concern because it inhibits national development and prosperity. The 2014 annual report by East African Development Bank indicated that in Burundi, government delays with public financial management reforms were likely to curtail donor support thereby triggering a slowdown in economic growth. Houreld (2017) reported that the United States government suspended $21 million in direct aid to Kenya’s Ministry of Health because of on-going concern about reports of corruption and weak accounting procedures.

Methodology
This was a conceptual paper which reviewed literature and also highlighted the views and opinions of the researchers in line with contribution of information professionals in fight against corruption

Corruption in Kenya
According to report presented by Samuel Kimeu in ICPAK conference February 2017, Kenyan government is said to lose one-third of the national budget to corruption –the equivalent of approximately $6 billion (Kshs.608 billion) every year. 
President Uhuru Kenyatta in an address to the nation also acknowledged that corruption has progressed to levels that threaten national security.

Audit reports from the Auditor General’s office have also incessantly given qualified and adverse audit opinions to government departments at both national and county levels indicating that many of the financial statements had fundamental discrepancies/misstatements
The cost of corruption in Kenya is manifest in political, economic, social and environmental stratus of the society and takes various forms.
Corruption excludes poor people from public services and perpetuates negative ethnicity and exclusion in the famously espoused culture of ‘It’s Our Turn to Eat’.
Corruption has resulted in Kenya being stagnant with an average Gross Domestic Product growth of just under 5%, aid dependant, high inflation rates and outstanding amount of public debt at over Ksh. 2.6 Trillion in 2015.

Kenya has declined in rank as it continues to post a poor score in the global Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2016. Kenya scored 26 on a scale of zero to 100 (with zero perceived to be highly corrupt, and 100 very clean), compared to a score of 25 in 2015.
It is ranked at position 145 out of 176 countries and territories included in the latest edition of the CPI. Kenya’s score is below the global average of 43 and Sub Saharan Africa’s mean of 31.
The County Governance Status Report 2016 also highlighted that 42% of citizens indicated that there was widespread corruption and mismanagement of funds at the counties while six out of ten respondents in the survey described the levels of corruption as high. Some of the recent corruption scandals as highlighted by ICPAC report (2017) are:
·         The NYS scandal where Ksh. 791 million payment was suspiciously been made to private companies or lost.
·         Chicken gate IEBC where electoral officials received over Ksh. 50 millions from foreign campanies.
·         Afya House Scandal – MoH diverted funds approximately KES 889 million  meant for county government, double payment of goods (approximately KES 515.7 Million), manipulation of the Integrated Financial Management System (IFMIS), payments of millions of shillings to phony suppliers in the financial year (2015/2016).
Some of other corruption scandals are
·         The NCPB maize scandal (KSh 1.9 billion) which KSh 1.9 billion was allegedly stolen in a conspiracy between the National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) officials and unscrupulous traders
·         The second National Youth Service (NYS) scandal (KSh 9 billion).
·         Galana and Mwea Irrigation Scheme scandal (KSh 3.5 billion) The NIB came under sharp scrutiny after the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) reportedly discovered the board awarded 15 irregular tenders worth KSh 953 million.
·         The Chickengate scandal (KSh 59 million) Britain’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in January 2016 handed over to Kenya a dossier in which a UK security printing firm, Smith & Ouzman, was accused of bribing IEBC officials to win tender, prior to the March 2013 general
·         The Goldenberg scandal (KSh 100 billion) In this scheme, the government allegedly subsidised exports of gold far beyond the standard arrangements during the 1990s, by paying Goldenberg International, a company owned by billionaire Kamlesh Pattni and ex-Spy Chief James Kanyotu, 35% more than the country's foreign currency earnings
·         The Eurobond scandal (KSh 215 billion) The Eurobond scandal was exposed by the former prime minister Raila Odinga and later confirmed by the Auditor General, Edward Ouko, who in 2016 claimed KSh 215 billion could not be accounted for.

Records Management professionals in fight against corruption.
Records management professionals’ supports sound records management in public institutions .Good records and information management specifically plays a significant role in combating corruption in three main ways: prevention of corrupt tendencies or fraud, facilitating smooth investigations by anti-corruption institutions; and providing evidence of transactions (Palmer 2000; World Bank 2000; Mnjama 2003; Kanzi 2010).

a)      Preventing corruption or fraud
A lot of resources are saved if corruption is prevented. Mnjama (2003) observes that there is a direct link between poor records keeping practices and corruption; among other root causes of corruption is the lack of good records keeping practices and failure by government or organizations to institute measures that will ensure that records and information are well managed for day-to-day business operations. People always look for loopholes in the systems when they want to commit fraud (Kemoni and Ngulube 2008; Kanzi 2010).

According to Bendu (2006), economic crime in Sierra Leone cannot be easily proved: ‘‘A lot of people accused of corrupt practices are often let off the hook because there are no evidential records and information to prove them guilty of fraud or embezzlement’’.

This is because the conviction of a person on corruption matters depends on authentic, trustworthy records and information as evidence of decisions and transactions. Proper maintenance and availability of these records and information is therefore prudent. Effective records management practices are essential to ensure that there are no loopholes in the system (Australian Council of Archives 1996). Ghost posts in an organization or institution cannot be ascertained and the exact expenditure cannot be traced if there are no proper and accurate records and information (Agere et al. 1999).

Maintaining procurement records and information is central to avoiding corrupt deals.
World Bank (2000:5) supports this by asserting that well managed records and information provide a cost-effective deterrent to fraud and corruption. To minimize corruption, government and organizations should redirect their focus towards promoting good records and Information management practices as one of the corruption prevention strategies, instead of directing a lot of resources towards investigating and detecting corruption (Kanzi 2010).
This would make a significant difference, as there would be fewer corruption and fraud cases to investigate when proper records and information management systems are entrenched within an organization. The money that would have gone into investigation, prosecution, recovery of stolen funds and imprisonment would be saved.

b)     Providing evidence of transactions
Palmer (2010) notes that authentic and reliable records can serve as evidence to identify abuse, misuse and non-compliance with financial  institutions and other laws and regulations. Information professional should make this evidence accessible when needed.

Records and information provide verifiable evidence of fraud that can lead investigators to the root cause of fraud. There is no way we can wipe out corruption without good records management as a point of reference for evidence of transactions (Okello-Obura 2007; Kemoni and Ngulube 2008)

Most, if not all, public and private accountability
loopholes may be traced to poor or non-existent records and information management systems (World Bank 2000, Palmer 2010). To eliminate scandals and risk of losses in an organization, the link between accountability and rigorous legal and financial record and information management must become more pronounced (Palmer 2010). For records and information management to play a cardinal role in fighting corruption, the RIM system should be free of corruption itself.

c)      Aiding EACC in investigations
Records professionals should assist anti- corruption agencies in investigation as they understand the records life cycle.  This includes courts, Director of public prosecutor, Director of criminal Investigation, Auditor general and police . Unfortunately, just like in other countries, little attention is being paid to the fact that the success of these institutions depends on the accessibility of complete, reliable and accurate records (Kanzi 2010).

Without good records and information, meaningful audits cannot be carried out as the records are the source of the information required by the auditors and investigators. Palmer (2010) states that ‘‘the role of a records and information
management system is that it acts as a control system that reinforces other control systems such as internal and external auditing’’. The records themselves can serve to detect fraud and recover the loss. Discrepancies or loopholes can be detected in the process of scrutinizing records and available information (Palmer 2000; Okello-Obura 2007). Corruption creates an environment
that allows opportunities to commit fraud, but once fraud is detected, records can provide a trail for investigators to track the root of corruption (Palmer 2000;Mnjama 2003; Kemoni and Ngulube 2008; Kanzi 2010).However, for records to be useful in this capacity, they must be well managed and accessible at all times by authorized users hence need for qualified records professionals.

For records management professional to achieve the above in fight against corruption, they must ensure the following
1.      Establishing sound records management systems and standards. The value of a Records and information management system is that it acts as a control system that reinforces other control systems such as internal and external audit (Palmer 2010). The creation and implementation of standards for records systems and document formats is crucial for identifying fraudulent documents and detecting gaps in records sequence. The inaccessibility or lack of documentary evidence results in increased opportunities for corruption and fraud to flourish (Palmer 2010).
2.      Establishing a strong records management audit trails system. A well organized registry Record system should track the movement of current records throughout the organization. The audit trail system helps to reveal any intentional or accidental unauthorized actions carried out on records like tampering, theft and loss. Authentic, reliable Records provides an unambiguous link between an authorization, a particular assigned person and a date, which can serve as evidence to identify abuse, misuse and non-compliance with laws and regulations (Palmer 2010).
3.      Designing and implementing policies and procedures for managements of electronic records. The potential for corruption and fraud in the electronic environment is greater because electronic records can be easily lost, overwritten, erased or rendered inaccessible, are media independent, hardware and software dependent, randomly located, easily duplicated and stored on potentially unstable media, etc. (Palmer 2010). In some organizations, the work is entirely left with information technology specialists or computer experts with little or no knowledge of records management. This makes the whole process of e-record management to be run unprofessionally, opening avenues to corruption and fraud
4.      Maintain high level of integrity . Perpetrators of crimes involving corruption have often amassed a lot of wealth and can easily compromise personnel who works in the registry. This of course affects the quality of investigation, prosecution and adjudication of corruption cases

Records and information management professional need opportunities to work with organizations in investigating methods to curb corrupt and fraudulent activities. Together they can develop, improve and strengthen systems to provide the evidence needed to expose corruption and ensure accountability. A strategy for keeping practical, productive records systems must therefore underpin anti-corruption strategies. Strategic Records and information management for accountability and fight against corruption, as noted by Baraga et al. (1999) should entail:

a)      Training Records and information managers to identify and control breeder documents and recognize situations where opportunities exist for fraud and corruption.
b)      Developing core competencies in maintaining records and inculcating professional ethics among records and information managers.
c)      Standardizing systems and document management formats to encourage a climate conducive to keeping and using records properly within organizations.
d)     Ensuring that records schedules, records inventories, registry lists, disaster plans, appraisal criteria, national or international standards, descriptive standards documentation, guidelines for the development of finding aids and professional ethics documents are available.
e)      Developing awareness raising workshops and training for anti-corruption groups, parliamentary committees responsible for public accounts accountability, auditors, etc. in how records can be manipulated and misused and on the need for a living wage for RIM managers. This is supported by Baraga et al. (1999), who note that educating public officers about the value of maintaining secure, authentic and reliable public financial records is important for fighting corruption in any country.
f)       Effective records and information management programmes. A comprehensive Records and information management  programme encompasses a multitude of disciplines. To ensure that an organization achieves this, the following elements should exist to ensure a complete programme: records appraisal, retention and disposition scheduling, vital records, disaster planning and recovery, forms management, management of active records systems (including directives and reports), records storage and archives management (Baraga et al. 1999).

Conclusion
Corruption, with its adverse effects, is on the increase in both public and private sectors. Good records and information management plays a significant role in deterring the corruption effect and is a preventive, cost-effective alternative to the prosecution of corrupt and fraudulent persons in any country. Even records managers sometimes facilitate corruption by acting unprofessionally and not following the appropriate Records management procedures. For organisations to ensure that corruption is eliminated, records and information management professionals need to learn more about the nature and characteristics of corruption and fraud in an organization. Efficient and effective Records management and management commitment is the solution for corruption and fraud

References
Agere S, Lemieux V and Mazikana P (1999)
              Better         information practices:
              Improving records and information
              management in the public sector.
              Managing the Public Service
             Strategies For Improvement Series:
             (6). London: Commonwealth
              Secretariat. 16 pp

Australian Council of Archives (1996)
             Corporate memory in the
             electronic age: Statement of a
             common position on electronic
recordkeeping. Available at:   http://www.nla.gov.au/dna/tf2001/padi/policy/html (Accessed:6th  August 2018)

Baraga K, Cain P and Thurston A (1999)
             From accounting to
              accountability: managing
              accounting records as a strategic
              resource. London: International
              Records Management Trust. pp. 47–
              56.

Bendu SM (2006) Accurate records
             management programme is the only
             perfect weapon to combat corruption
             in Sierra Leone. Available
             at:http://news.sl/drwebsite/exec/vie
             wcgi?archive¼3&num¼1894  
             Accessed:8th  August 2018)

Kanzi N (2010) An investigation of the role
           of records management with specific
            reference to Amathole District
           Municipality Noluvuyo Kanz.
           Dissertation submitted in partial
           fulfillment of the requirements of the
           Master’s degree in Public
           Administration in the Faculty of Arts
           at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan
           University, available at:
              http://www.nmmu.ac.za/documents/theses/MAP%20Treatise%20for%20N.Kanzi.pdf,(Accessed:8th August 2018)

Kemoni H and Ngulube P (2008)
            Relationship between records
            management, public service delivery
            and the attainment of the United
           Nations Millennium Development
           Goals in Kenya. Information
           Development 24(4): 296–306
           Availableat: http://idv.sagepub.
           com/content/24/4/296.full.pdf .
          (Accessed:8th  August 2018)

Keorapetse DL and Keakopa SM (2011)
          Records management as a means to
         fight corruption and enhance
         accountability in Botswana. Paper
       presented at the XXI Bi-Annual East
       and Southern Africa Regional Branch of
        the International Council on Archives
       (ESARBICA), General Conference on
        Access to Information: Archives and
        Records in Support of Public Sector
        Reform in Context, Maputo,
        Mozambique, 6–10 June 2011.
       Available at: www.ica.org/download 
       .php?id¼1401 
        Accessed 8th August 2018)
Mnjama N (2003) Combating corruption
            through efficient records
            management practices in Kenya.
            Paper presented at the XVII Biennial
            Eastern and Southern Africa Regional
            of Branch of the International Council
           on Archives (ESARBICA) General
            Conference on Archives, Society and
            Good Governance, 22–26 July 2003,
            pp. 1–16.

Okello-Obura C (2007) Uganda: we cannot
            wipe out corruption without good
             records management. New Vision,
             4th December 2007.

Palmer M (2000) Records management and
             accountability versus corruption,
             fraud and maladministration.
             Records Management Journal 1(2):
             61–72.
World Bank Group (2000) Managing records
              as the basis for effective service
              delivery and public accountability in
              development: An introduction to
               core principles for staff of the
               World Bank and its partners . 46 p.
               Available at: http://web.worldbank
               .org/  (Accessed:8th August 2018)
About the Author
Douglas Mwangi Maina is a Masters student in the school of Information Science and Technology, Kisii University, Kenya. He is an archivist and a Certified Records Management Analyst (CRMA) and also hold CPA(Sec 4). You can reach him on   0717834480. Email:mainamwangi1989@gmail.com